While there are situations where
Macs are justified, the steamrolling in the media by the
Apple-centric movement to “iEverything” helps fuel a majority of
this misconception surrounding the Apple brand.
I’ve done quite a bit of
research on many of these myths over the years and have formulated
educated responses when my customers, friends and family ask for my
professional opinion. I’m not
an Apple hater, but I do want to better educate my customers
and dispel the myths that never seem to die. Techs like us
are considered the technology expert by our own fellow customers, so
it’s a good idea to have a rounded consideration of the other side
of the fervent pro-Mac argument. I like to present my customers with
the real facts and let them
decide on which route they want to go.
Let’s have a look at the 2 most
common myths that I hear from customers:
Myth
#1: “Macs don’t get viruses; hence they are the most secure
computer.”
As long as computers and software
are made by humans, they will be insecure. Let’s not kid ourselves.
While the above argument would have been slightly more plausible in
the remaining stretch of Windows XP’s heyday (2004-2007 or so) when
viruses and malware were just destroying the aging OS (operating
system), the times have since changed. It’s 2013 and malware
writers have finally noticed the Mac market as being sizable enough
to matter.
I guess therein lies the other
misconception about Windows machines – that they are innately
insecure because Windows is a poorly written OS, Microsoft doesn’t
care about us, etc. Surprisingly, the opposite seems to be true
according to numerous reports. Security vendor Secunia came out with
a study that said Apple
actually has the most holes
of any major software maker, and white hat hacker and security
research team lead at 3Com Tippingpoint, Aaron Portnoy, told
Computerworld that Windows
7 was much safer
than Apple’s Snow Leopard OS from his findings during exploit
hunts.
Myth
#2: “Everyone says Macs have a lower total cost of ownership
(TCO).”
One thing business owners love to
discuss with me is TCO. Seeing that many of them are average
consumers as well, they’ve heard the tagline of Macs costing less
to operate in comparison to PCs. I then start to run the numbers with
them compared to their current environment. Let’s say a
hypothetical business owner runs an office of 6 machines. He is
considering moving to all Macs. They use a scattering of programs
including Access and Quickbooks. The cheapest Mac desktop they can
purchase is the $1200
iMac.
There’s no Mac version of Access, and they don’t want to use a
watered down edition of Quickbooks on the Mac, so they decide to go
the Parallels route for each workstation.
Not only do they need a copy of
Parallels for each machine, but now a legal copy of Windows 7 is
necessary for every Mac to run their business programs. Add in
antivirus solutions for both the native Mac OS X and virtual Windows
environments and software costs just skyrocketed. And let’s not
forget that workers will likely need to be retrained on how to work a
multi-OS Parallels environment – tacking re-education costs
onto the final transition bill. Similar conditions can keep the tab
on a consumer-oriented migration high as well, namely in re-education
and dual-licensing scenarios. And remember that Macs start at $1199
USD. Comparable high end PCs could be had for a few hundred less, and
more cost effective mid-range PCs go for nearly half that price. In
this economy, that initial cost difference is a tough sell for some.
You can see where the path is
headed. Every time I have a discussion like this with a business
owner, they quickly realize that Mac isn’t always the nirvana of
cost reduction everyone claims.
These are just the top 2 most
common Myths about Macs. I actually have 5 of them listed on my blog.
If you would like read about all 5 myths and even have a chance to
comment and voice your opinion, please visit my blog
www.mycompit.com/blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment